4.7 Article

A New Divergence Method to Quantify Methane Emissions Using Observations of Sentinel-5P TROPOMI

Journal

GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 48, Issue 18, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GL094151

Keywords

methane emissions; divergence; TROPOMI; Texas

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [842113005]
  2. Postdoctoral Applied Research Project of Qingdao [862105040030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new divergence method for estimating methane emissions using satellite observed mean mixing ratio of methane in the Planetary Boundary Layer has been proven applicable by comparing with known emission inventories, especially in identifying emission sources in Texas. The calculated yearly averaged total CH4 emissions over the Permian Basin are consistent with previous studies, highlighting the robustness and simplicity of the method for global CH4 emission estimation.
We present a new divergence method to estimated methane (CH4) emissions from satellite observed mean mixing ratio of methane (XCH4) by deriving the regional enhancement of XCH4 in the Planetary Boundary Layer (PBL). The applicability is proven by comparing the estimated emissions with its known emission inventory from a 3-month GEOS-Chem simulation. When applied to TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument observations, sources from well-known oil/gas production areas, livestock farms and wetlands in Texas become clearly visible in the emission maps. The calculated yearly averaged total CH4 emission over the Permian Basin is 3.06 (2.82, 3.78) Tg a(-1) for 2019, which is consistent with previous studies and double that of EDGAR v4.3.2 for 2012. Sensitivity tests on PBL heights, on the derived regional background and on wind speeds suggest our divergence method is quite robust. It is also a fast and simple method to estimate the CH4 emissions globally.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available