4.6 Article

The extreme 2013/14 winter storms: Regional patterns in multi-annual beach recovery

Journal

GEOMORPHOLOGY
Volume 389, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2021.107828

Keywords

Beach recovery; Storm response; LiDAR; Beach classification; Extreme storms; Geomorphic change detection; Coastal management

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Through studying 23 sites along the southwest coast of England, it was found that beaches can be classified into four response types after extreme storm events, which show spatial and temporal patterns in post-storm recovery.
Understanding the mechanisms and timescales required for beaches to recover from extreme storm events is fundamental for coastal management worldwide. Yet the post-storm recovery characteristics of different beach types have rarely been investigated over multi-annual timescales. Previous work along the southwest coast of England has suggested that the magnitude and alongshore variability of beach response to storms can be grouped into four key response types controlled by the level of exposure, angle of storm wave approach and degree of embaymentisation. This study aims to enhance our understanding of the spatial and temporal patterns of post-storm beach recovery within this storm response classification framework. Analysis was based on morphological survey data from 23 sites along the southwest coast of England collected between 2012 and 2017. We found that beaches that responded similarly to the unprecedented storm sequence of 2013/14, recovered in a similar manner too, and that spatio-temporal patterns of post-storm recovery can, for the most part, also be described by four coherent classes. In terms of complete recovery to pre-2013/14 volumes, 7 of the 23 beaches we studied recovered >90% of their sediment within 3 years or less, including some of the most affected sites. The magnitude of intertidal beach volume recovered (in the order of 1-100 m(3) m(-1)) was well correlated with the storm erosion volume (R =-0.81, p = 0.00) and, importantly, was similar for beaches within the same response class. Fully exposed, cross-shore dominated beaches experienced the highest gross erosion and recovery volumes, but showed the lowest net recovery after 3 years (median: 74% volume recovered), while semi-exposed cross-shore dominated beaches showed lower gross change, but the highest net recovery (median: 93% volume recovered).In most cases, the spatial pattern of recovery mirrored that of the storm impact, regardless of whether the beach was cross-shore or alongshore dominant. The observed coherency within each of the four studied beach response classes indicates that regional monitoring programmes could make considerable cost savings by strategically targeting monitoring at representative sites within each class, rather than monitoring all beaches within a region. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available