4.7 Article

Multi-isotopic and trace element evidence against different formation pathways for oyster microstructures

Journal

GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 308, Issue -, Pages 326-352

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2021.06.012

Keywords

Oyster; Bivalve; trace element; Stable isotope; microstructure; Sclerochronology; Mg/Ca; Clumpcd isotopes; nitrogen isotopes; Sulfur isotopes; Crassostrea gigas; SEM; XRF; Calcite; Biomineralization; Distribution coefficient; Paleoclimate

Funding

  1. Marie Skodowska Curie Individual Fellowship by the European Commission [843011-UNBIAS]
  2. Flemish Research Council (FWO) [12ZB220N]
  3. Netherlands Earth System Science Center (NESSC) from the Dutch Ministry for Education, Culture and Science [024.002.001, NWO 024.002.001]
  4. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) [SCHO793/20+23]
  5. Belgian Science Policy (BELSPO)
  6. Research Foundation-Flanders (FWOVlaanderen)
  7. FWO through the EOS-Excellence of Science program [30442502, ZW15-02 - G0H6216N]
  8. NWO VIDI project - Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [016.161.365]
  9. Hercules infrastructure grants

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Studies on modern shells of Pacific oysters show no support for the formation of chalky calcite by microorganisms, while indicating slight differences in oxygen isotope ratio and clumped isotope composition between different microstructures, likely due to sampling biases from seasonal variations and short formation timespan. The incorporation of elements into oyster shells, especially in different microstructures, should be considered when developing potential proxies for paleoclimate reconstructions.
Shells of oysters (Ostreidae) are predominantly composed of foliated and chalky calcite microstructures. The formation process of the more porous chalky structure is subject to debate, with some studies suggesting that it is not formed directly by the oyster but rather through microbial mineralization within the shell. Here, this hypothesis is tested in modern shells of the Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) from coastal regions in France and the Netherlands. We combine measurements of stable carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, sulfur, and clumped isotope ratios with high-resolution spatially resolved element (Na, Mg, Cl, S, Mn and Sr) data and microscopic observations of chalky and foliated microstructures in the oyster shells. Our results show no isotopic differences between the different microstructures, arguing against formation of the chalky calcite by microorganisms. However, we observe a small difference in the oxygen isotope ratio (0.32 parts per thousand) and clumped isotope composition (0.017 parts per thousand) between the microstructures, which is likely caused by sampling biases due to seasonal differences in growth rate and the short timespan over which the chalky microstructure forms. We therefore recommend sampling profiles through the foliated microstructure to control for strong seasonal variability recorded in the shell which can bias environmental reconstructions. High-resolution (25-50 mu m) Na, Mg, Cl, S, Mn and Sr profiles yield empirical distribution coefficients between seawater and shell calcite for these elements. Significant differences in element concentrations and distribution coefficients were confirmed between the two microstructures, likely reflecting differences in mineralization rates or inclusion of non-lattice-bound elements. Only Mg/Ca ratios in the foliated microstructure vary predictably with growth seasonality, and we show that these can be used to establish accurate oyster shell chronologies. The observed effect of mineralization rate on element incorporation into oyster shells should be considered while developing potential element proxies for paleoclimate reconstructions. Trace element proxies in oyster shells should be interpreted with caution, especially when element chemical properties were measured in different microstructures. (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available