4.5 Article

Hydrothermal Cooling as a Requirement for Short Storage of Silicic Magmas

Journal

GEOCHEMISTRY GEOPHYSICS GEOSYSTEMS
Volume 22, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

AMER GEOPHYSICAL UNION
DOI: 10.1029/2021GC009794

Keywords

calderas; silicic magma; thermodynamics; hydrothermal systems; short magma storage; Taupo Volcanic Zone

Funding

  1. Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences at Vanderbilt University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study highlights the evidence of crystallization and storage of large magma bodies in the Taupo Volcanic Zone in New Zealand decades to centuries before eruptions. It suggests that convective hydrothermal systems are necessary for short-term heat extraction from large magma bodies, rather than purely conductive models, presenting potential future directions for monitoring unstable calderas in environments with abundant hydrothermal activity like the TVZ.
Large (>50 km(3)) magma bodies that contribute to caldera-forming eruptions in the Taupo Volcanic Zone (TVZ), New Zealand have shown evidence for crystallization and storage on the order of decades to centuries prior to eruption. We compare various conductive and convective heat extraction models to determine which is more likely to enable the heat loss required for short magma storage. We conclude that purely conductive models only account for heat loss on millennial or longer timescales. We also show that convective hydrothermal systems with heat output of 1,000 MW in magnitude are required for decadal heat extraction from a large, contiguous magma body; yet, heat output similar to present-day conditions would be suitable for cooling magma distributed as a patchwork of smaller magma bodies. This study shows the potential connection with heat flow at the surface and the presence of a magma body, providing future directions for monitoring restless calderas in environments with a wealth of hydrothermal activity like the TVZ.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available