4.4 Article

Differences between predicted outer membrane proteins of Pasteurella multocida, Histophilus somni, and genotype 1 and 2 Mannheimia haemolytica strains isolated from cattle

Journal

GENOME
Volume 65, Issue 2, Pages 115-121

Publisher

CANADIAN SCIENCE PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1139/gen-2021-0038

Keywords

Histophilus somni; Mannheimia haemolytica; Pasteurella multocida; outer membrane proteins; bovine respiratory disease

Funding

  1. United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Agricultural Research Service (ARS) [3040-32000-034-00D]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Common bacterial causes of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) include Histophilus somni, Mannheimia haemolytica, and Pasteurella multocida. This study focused on the core genomes and outer membrane proteins (OMPs) of these bacteria, providing potential candidates for further research and interventions against BRD.
Common bacterial causes of bovine respiratory disease (BRD) include Histophilus somni , Mannheimia haemolytica , and Pasteurella multocida. Within M. haemolytica , two major genotypes are commonly found in cattle (1 and 2); however, genotype 2 strains are isolated from diseased lungs much more frequently than genotype 1 strains. Outer membrane proteins (OMPs) of H. somni , P. multocida , and genotype 2 M. haemolytica may be important factors for acquired host immunity. The predicted OMP differences between genotypes 1 and 2 M. haemolytica have been previously identified. In this study, we expanded the focus to include bovine-isolated strain genomes representing all three species and the two M. haemolytica genotypes. Reported here are the core genomes unique to each of them, core genomes shared between some or all combinations of the three species and two M. haemolytica genotypes, and predicted OMPs within these core genomes. The OMPs identified in this study are potential candidates for further studies and the development of interventions against BRD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available