4.5 Article

Firearms storage safety discussions in VA primary care: Staff perspectives

Journal

GENERAL HOSPITAL PSYCHIATRY
Volume 72, Issue -, Pages 96-101

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2021.07.007

Keywords

Primary care; Veterans; Firearms safety; Depression; PTSD

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs, Veteran Health Administration, Office of Mental Health and Suicide Prevention and Health Services and Research and Development Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care (CIVIC) [CIN 13-404]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Primary care clinicians and staff in VHA perceive conducting firearms storage safety discussions in primary care as acceptable, and have outlined five tools and processes to facilitate these discussions effectively.
Objective: To describe VHA primary care clinician and staff perspectives on conducting firearms storage safety (FSS) discussions in primary care, and to identify key approaches for primary care teams to facilitate FSS conversations. Method: Qualitative analysis of transcripts and notes from focus groups with VA primary care staff and individual semi-structured interviews with primary care clinicians. One hundred-seven VHA primary care team members participated in one of four focus groups or individual semi-structured interviews (n = 5). Results: FSS discussions are perceived as within the purview of primary care. Primary care staff also outlined five tools and processes needed to meaningfully implement FSS discussions in primary care: training on firearms and firearms culture; examining personal attitudes toward firearms; developing supplemental materials to normalize and support FSS discussions; increasing knowledge of firearms laws and regulations; and providing scripts to facilitate conversations. Conclusions: Conducting FSS discussions in primary care settings is perceived as an acceptable practice, yet care teams identified barriers and suggestions for overcoming implementation challenges.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available