4.7 Article

Cost-effectiveness of risk-stratified endoscopic screening for esophageal cancer in high-risk areas of China: a modeling study

Journal

GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY
Volume 95, Issue 2, Pages 225-+

Publisher

MOSBY-ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2021.08.008

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Key Technologies Research and Development Program in China [2018YFC1313100]
  2. National High-tech Research and Development Program [201502001]
  3. Beijing Science and Technology Planning Project [J200017]
  4. Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen [SZSM201911015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of risk-stratified endoscopic screening (RSES) for once in a lifetime esophageal cancer (EC) screening in high-risk areas of China, and identify the optimal risk-score thresholds. The results showed that RSES is cost-effective, with a score threshold of 8 or 9 recommended for screening ages <55 years, and universal endoscopic screening recommended for individuals aged >=55 years.
Background and Aims: Risk-stratified endoscopic screening (RSES) has been suggested to improve screening efficiency. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of RSES and identify the optimal risk-score thresholds for once in a lifetime esophageal cancer (EC) screening in high-risk areas of China. Methods: From a healthcare system perspective, a Markov model was constructed to compare the cost-effectiveness of 13 RSES strategies (under different score thresholds for EC risk), universal endoscopic screening strategy, and no screening. Six cohorts of 100,000 participants with different screening ages (40-65 years) were followed up to age 77 years. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), that is, incremental costs per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained, was the primary outcome. Results: Compared with no screening, as the score threshold was lowered, additionally gained QALYs increased, with 49 to 172 QALYs and 329 to 1147 QALYs gained from screening performed at 40 and 65 years, respectively. RSES in all age scenarios had ICERs less than the gross domestic product (GDP) per capita, and 11 RSES strategies with score thresholds of 3 to 13 had lower ICERs than universal endoscopic screening. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of the GDP per capita (U.S.$10,276/QALY), RSES at score thresholds of 8 or 9 and universal endoscopic screening were the most cost-effective strategies at ages <55 and >= 55 years, respectively. Conclusions: RSES is cost-effective, and score thresholds of 8 or 9 should be considered for screening ages <55 years. For individuals aged >= 55 years, universal endoscopic screening is the optimal strategy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available