4.5 Article

Alternatives for upgrading the EU DCLL breeding blanket from MMS to SMS

Journal

FUSION ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112380

Keywords

DEMO; DCLL; Blanket

Funding

  1. Euratom research and training programme 2014-2018 [633053]
  2. European Regional Development Fund (ERDF)
  3. Euratom research and training programme 2019-2020 [633053]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CIEMAT has been working on developing a low temperature DCLL breeding blanket using the MMS approach to improve competitiveness and reduce electricity costs. In order to achieve this, they are exploring more advanced blanket solutions based on the SMS structure and the use of self-cooled incompressible liquid breeder.
In the last years, CIEMAT worked in the development of a low temperature DCLL breeding blanket design aimed at using conventional materials and technologies. It followed the multi-module segment (MMS) approach, which allows operating within the thermal range tolerated by EUROFER while keeping a low bulk velocity of the selfcooled liquid breeder (PbLi) in the breeding zone. Thinking in the commercial exploitation of fusion, it must be taken into account that there is risk that the foreseen availability goal in fusion reactors is not achieved. In that case, the limited net efficiency of low temperature blankets could not be sufficient to obtain a competitive cost of the electricity. For that reason, more advanced blanket solutions are being explored with the objective of developing a simpler, more reliable and more efficient design based on a single-module segment (SMS) architecture and the use of self-cooled incompressible liquid breeder. In this work, different strategies to solve interrelated aspects like the topology and electrical insulation of the breeder circuits, the first wall integration and the main neutronic responses are analysed and discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available