4.7 Article

Effect of acidity on ferric oxide nanoparticles supported on γ-χ-Al2O3 in the methanol dehydration reaction toward dimethyl ether

Journal

FUEL
Volume 296, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120618

Keywords

Methanol dehydration; Ferric oxide nanoparticle; Dimethyl ether; Acid sites

Funding

  1. DGAPA grant PAPIIT [IN107220]
  2. internal project of the Universidad Estatal de Sonora [UES-PII-20-UAM-IG-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, a low-cost synthesis method was used to prepare the Fe2O3/????Al2O3 catalyst, which showed a significant improvement in methanol dehydration conversion rate and selectivity towards DME. The Fe2O3/????Al2O3 catalyst exhibited a stable structure and low activation energy, making it a promising candidate for methanol dehydration under specific conditions.
In this work, the low cost synthesis of the Fe2O3/????Al2O3 catalyst, carried out by the wet impregnation method, promoted a conversion in methanol dehydration by 46% (an increase of 5% with respect to ????Al2O3 support), and with a selectivity of 100% towards DME (at 250 ?C and 1 atm pressure), due to a higher abundance in the density of moderate acidic sites generated by the synergistic metal-support interaction. The slight decrease in catalytic activity for the Fe2O3/????Al2O3 system, compared to the ????Al2O3 from 260 ?C, was linked to the effect of changes in the shape and size of the Fe2O3 nanoparticles. These particles went from semi-spherical to nano-needles at 290 ?C reaction temperature. Finally, the great structural stability of Fe3+ measured by XPS, RAMAN spectroscopy and UV?Vis, and the low activation energy of the Fe2O3/????Al2O3 material (102.66 kJ/ mol), place the Fe2O3/????Al2O3 catalyst as an excellent candidate for methanol dehydration, under conditions of 240 to 250 ?C and methanol partial pressures between 9.8 and 7.8 kPa, respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available