4.7 Article

Coking behavior and syngas composition of the char supported Fe catalyst of biomass pyrolysis volatiles reforming

Journal

FUEL
Volume 298, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2021.120830

Keywords

Flammable gas production; WS@5 Fe catalyst; Deactivation; Carbon deposition

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21968037]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province [2019FB132]
  3. Training Program for Middle and Young Backbone Teachers in Donglu Yunnan University [C176220200]
  4. Graduate Research and Innovation Project of Yunnan University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The addition of WS@5 Fe catalyst significantly affects the distribution of products during biomass pyrolysis and volatile reforming reactions, leading to a decrease in char and heavy oil yield. In addition, carbon deposition on the catalyst is mainly attributed to the wrapping and covering of Fe by coke during the catalyst cycle process.
The biomass for flammable gas production and its carbon deposition behaviour has been studied in a lab-scale fixed bed reactor, comprising pyrolysis and subsequent volatiles reforming produced in situ reaction. The distribution of pyrolysis products varies greatly with the addition of WS@5 Fe catalyst. During catalyst cycle process, both the char and heavy oil yield decreases significantly from 27.34% and 6.73% to 20.41% and 4.12%, respectively. This work also focuses on the carbon deposition of the WS@5 Fe catalyst used in the second step. The amount of coke on quartz tube wall (coke 1) decrease with increasing the temperature, and the surface carbon of the catalyst (coke 2) is found. Deactivated catalyst samples are recovered. The results present that the deactivation is attributed to the wrapping and covering of Fe by coke. There are reactions such as the coke deposition, the coke consumption, and the gasification reaction of char.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available