4.7 Article

Toward a roadmap for diadromous fish conservation: the Big Five considerations

Journal

FRONTIERS IN ECOLOGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT
Volume 19, Issue 7, Pages 396-403

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/fee.2361

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO) as part of Belgium's contribution to LifeWatch
  2. Ghent University [17GOA-026]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The increasing habitat fragmentation is a major factor leading to dramatic reductions in migratory species populations worldwide, particularly diadromous fish species. Despite numerous management measures and investments, desired results are often lacking. A comprehensive management strategy that considers the five major factors influencing diadromous fish species is proposed for restoring their populations.
Increasing habitat fragmentation is a major contributing factor to dramatic reductions in populations of migratory species worldwide. Diadromous fish species in particular are affected by this anthropogenic disturbance, resulting in historically low population abundances. Despite a plethora of management measures and considerable investment, desired results are often lacking. Here, we highlight five important considerations - the Big Five - for diadromous species management: removal of barriers to migration, installation of fish passages, habitat restoration, restocking, and fisheries management. We review current management measures and their effectiveness, and propose a way forward. Current management of diadromous fish populations largely focuses on mitigation of migration barriers, but management will likely fail if other fundamental aspects of diadromous species' life cycles are overlooked or disregarded. We therefore propose an integrated management strategy that takes into account the five major factors influencing diadromous fish species, with the ultimate goal of restoring their populations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available