4.7 Article

TNF promotes M1 polarization through mitochondrial metabolism in injured spinal cord

Journal

FREE RADICAL BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE
Volume 172, Issue -, Pages 622-632

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2021.07.014

Keywords

TNF; Spinal cord injury; Redox imbalance; Mitochondria; Zinc

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [81871556, 82072165]
  2. Liaoning Revital-ization Talents Program [XLYC1902108]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that TNF ablation promoted the beneficial conversion from M1 to M2 phenotype, improved mitochondrial metabolism, and reduced ROS activity. Systemic application of TPEN increased the ratio of M1 M/Ms, while prolonged TNF expression was found to be destructive to recovery after SCI.
Macrophages and microglia (M/Ms) in the injured spinal cord maintain a predominantly neurotoxic M1 phenotype that is disadvantageous to repair in the development of spinal cord injury (SCI). It has been reported that tumor necrosis factor (TNF) that polarize M/Ms toward M1 state in various disorders. In this study, we found that ablation of TNF endorsed the beneficial conversion from M1 to M2 phenotype and improved the mitochondrial metabolism in vivo and in vitro. In addition, PGC-1 alpha that accumulates in TNF null mice, a major participant of mitochondrial metabolism, downregulated ROS activity and the expressions of M1-specific mRNA. Moreover, the absence of TNF upgraded the morphology and quantity of damaged mitochondria and rapidly switched to M2 phenotype as compare to administration of N-Acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC). Furthermore, systemic application of TPEN showed that increased ratio of M1 M/Ms. These combined results supporting predominant and prolonged TNF expression that is destructive to recovery after SCI. These results indicated that TNF would have great potential immunomodulatory for the treatment of SCI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available