4.5 Article

Commentary AK bullet (7,62 x 39 mm) ricochet off flat, wooden targets; A forensic- based study

Journal

FORENSIC SCIENCE INTERNATIONAL
Volume 326, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2021.110903

Keywords

Forensic ballistics; Ricochet; AK bullets; Wood surfaces; Shooting incident; Reconstructions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study examined the ricochet behavior of AK bullets on various wooden surfaces, highlighting the similarities in critical angles and consistent widths of wipe marks, which can serve as valuable references for shooting investigations. The study also observed bullet tunneling effects on pinewood samples, emphasizing the variability of bullet ricochet phenomena and the challenges in using theoretical and experimental results for shooting reconstructions.
The ricochet behaviour of AK bullets (7,62 x 39 mm), one of the prominently reported bullet type in recent shooting incidents worldwide, has been examined on a range of different wooden surfaces in this study. The critical angles of AK bullets for teak, Jack wood, mahogany and pine were reported with close values ranging from 9.9 to 13.3-degrees, suggestive of being a valuable reference that can be used during AK bullet ricochet-related shooting investigations with similar conditions. The study also highlighted a significant phenomenon against the existing understanding on the wood hardness and the critical angles of bullets. The widths of the AK bullet wipe marks generated on the wood surfaces were highly consistent, regardless of impact angle, allowing an effective approximation of bullet caliber. Bullet tunnelling effect were also observed with pinewood samples in this study. The study also further highlights the great variability of bullet ricochet phenomena and the challenging nature of using the theoretical and experimental results relates to wood ricochet studies for shooting reconstructions. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available