4.7 Article

Lipid profile and high contents of cholesterol oxidation products (COPs) in different commercial brands of canned tuna

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 352, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129334

Keywords

Canned tuna; Brine; Vegetable oil; Cholesterol oxides; Polyunsaturated fatty acids

Funding

  1. Natl. Brazilian Research Foundations (CAPES)
  2. Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), Brazil [2008/58035-6]
  3. FAPERJ [E-26/010.000857/2015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the influence of different liquid mediums (oil and brine) on the fatty acid composition and formation of cholesterol oxidation products (COPs) in canned Brazilian tuna. It was found that tuna in brine had higher levels of COPs compared to tuna in oil. This was attributed to the presence of pro-oxidant elements in brine and greater heat transfer compared to oil. The study highlighted the role of liquid mediums in oxidative processes in canned tuna.
Canned fish is submitted to processes that may degrade its lipids and form harmful compounds called cholesterol oxidation products (COPs). Samples of Brazilian commercial canned tuna were analyzed to evaluate the influence of different liquid mediums (oil and brine) on the fatty acid composition and formation of COPs. The exchange between fish lipids and the constituents of the covering liquid was highlighted by the high levels of linoleic acid found in tuna conserved in oil. High amounts of COPs were found. However, higher contents of COPs were found in tuna in brine (933.14 to 1914.23 ?g/g) than in oil (698.24 to 1167.88 ?g/g). This result was mainly promoted by the presence of pro-oxidant elements such as salt, as well as greater heat transfer in brine than in oil. This study showed that canned tuna is a potential source of exogenous COPs, indicating the role of liquid mediums in oxidative processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available