4.7 Article

Evaluation of vitamin D bioaccessibility and mineral solubility from test meals containing meat and/or cereals and/or pulses using in vitro digestion

Journal

FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 347, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128621

Keywords

Cholecalciferol; Iron; Zinc; Magnesium; Bioavailability; Chickpeas; Pancreatic lipase; Lipolysis

Funding

  1. national Priority Action of the Human Nutrition department of the French National Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment (INRAE)
  2. CTCPA
  3. INRAE
  4. C2VN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the transfer of vitamin D and minerals during digestion of meals with/without pulses. Chickpea presence decreased vitamin D bioaccessibility and mineral solubility, with tannins having the most negative impact on iron solubility. Future research should explore solutions to selectively decrease harmful compounds in pulses that affect micronutrient bioavailability.
In this study, we evaluated vitamin D and mineral (iron, zinc, magnesium) transfer to the bolus aqueous phase during the digestion of meals with/without pulses. We performed in vitro digestions using test meals made either of i) beef and/or semolina and/or chickpeas, or of ii) potatoes supplemented or not with fibers, phytates, tannins and saponins. Chickpea presence led to a decrease in vitamin D bioaccessibility (-56%, p < 0.05) and mineral solubility (-28% for iron, p < 0.05) compared with meals with beef and/or semolina only. This effect was largely compensated for vitamin D by the fact that this vitamin was more stable during digestion of meals based on plant foods only than of meals with beef. Tannins were the most deleterious compounds for iron solubility, while phytates and tannins decreased vitamin D bioaccessibility. Agronomical or technical solutions to selectively decrease the amount in pulses of compounds that affect micronutrient bioavailability should be further explored.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available