4.7 Article

Comparison of physicochemical and umami characterization of aqueous and ethanolic Takifugu obscurus muscle extracts

Journal

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 154, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112317

Keywords

Ethanolic extracts; Takifugu obscurus; Taste characterization; NMR; Nano LC-MS; Antioxidant peptides

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31901813, 31972198, 32001827]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study compared the molecular weight distributions and sensory characteristics of ethanol and aqueous Takifugu obscurus muscle extracts. The results indicated that the 60% ethanolic extract fraction had the highest umami intensity and more palatable overall taste among all pufferfish extracts. The study also identified an antioxidant activity in the 60% ethanolic extract fraction and screened several antioxidant peptides.
Most umami substances were developed in aqueous extracts. In this study, we compared the molecular weight distributions and sensory characteristics of ethanol and aqueous Takifugu obscurus muscle extracts, and assessed their taste-related metabolites and peptide profile (< 3 kDa) using nuclear magnetic resonance and nano liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. The potential antioxidant peptide in ethanolic fraction was screened using Peptide Ranker, BIOPEP and quantum chemical simulations. The results indicated that 60% ethanolic extract fraction (60%-F) had the highest umami intensity and more palatable overall taste among all pufferfish extracts. It can be caused by more umami enhancing components such as Asp, Asn, Ala and 5 '-AMP, and considerable umami-potential smaller peptides in 60%-F. 60%-F also showed an antioxidant activity, and several antioxidant peptides was screened. The present study indicated the relationship between extract solution and taste characterization, which provided more possibility for the exploitation of umami substances and screening potential activity peptides.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available