4.7 Article

Two generation reproduction toxicity study of GmDREB3 gene modified wheat in Wistar rats

Journal

FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY
Volume 153, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2021.112310

Keywords

Genetically modified wheat; DREB3; Reproduction toxicity; Rats

Funding

  1. major science and technology project for cultivation of new crop varieties using gene transfer technology
  2. Ministry of Agriculture of the People's Republic of China [2014ZX08011005, 2016ZX08011005]
  3. GM wheat and non-GM wheat (Jimai22)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a two-generation reproductive toxicology study, no adverse effects related to gene modified wheat were observed in rats compared to non-gene modified wheat, indicating that gene modified wheat is a safe alternative in terms of reproductive toxicity.
To study reproductive toxicity of gene modified wheat generated by introducing DREB3 (drought response element binding protein 3) gene, Wistar rats of were allocated into 3 groups and fed with DREB3 gene modified wheat mixture diet (GM group), non-gene modified wheat mixture diet (Non-GM group) and AIN-93 diet (Control group) from parental generation (F0) to the second offspring (F2). GM wheat and Non-GM wheat, Jimai22, were both formulated into diets at a ratio of 69.55% according to AIN93 diet for rodent animals. Compared with non-GM group, no biologically related differences were observed in GM group rats with respect to reproductive performance such as fertility rate, gestation rate, mean duration, hormone level, reproductive organ pathology and developmental parameters such as body weight, body length, food consumption, neuropathy, behavior, immunotoxicity, hematology and serum chemistry. In conclusion, no adverse effect were found relevant to GM wheat in the two generation reproduction toxicity study, indicating the GM wheat is a safe alternative for its counterpart wheat regarding to reproduction toxicity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available