4.4 Article

Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in tea, herbal tea and iced tea beverages- survey and transfer rates

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/19440049.2021.1941302

Keywords

Pyrrolizidine alkaloids; tea; herbal tea; iced tea; transfer rate; selective elution; LC-HR-MS

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found high transfer rates of 37 pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PA) from tea and herbal teas to their brews, with some unexpected alkaloids identified. Monitoring of PA content in tea beverages is necessary to ensure safety.
The transfer rate of 37 pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PA) found in ten naturally contaminated teas and herbal teas to their brews was studied in detail. Mixed herbal, peppermint, red bush, senna, black tea and green tea infusions were prepared according to the ISO guide and vendor's instructions, respectively, and parameters like herb-to-water ratio, steeping time and multiple extractions studied. In general, a transfer rate of 38-100% (median 95%) for brews following vendor's instructions was determined. The total concentration range of PA in these ten samples was 154-2412 ng/g (median 422 ng/g) in the herb and for single analytes 0.1-170 ng/g. Seven of the 37 PA occurred unexpectedly; these were tentatively identified and quantified by liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HR-MS), since their contributions to total PA-content matter. Additionally, 46 iced tea beverages were analysed for their PA-load, determined to be in the range 0-631 ng/L (median 40 ng/L). The applied solid-phase extraction (SPE) clean-up turned out to be capable of separating PA in the free base pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAFB) and their N-oxides (PANO) in a two-step elution, which was a valuable tool to support identification of unexpected PA. Further, atropine was found in 50% of the ten tea herb samples (range: 1-4 ng/g) and in 13% of the iced tea beverage samples (range: 2-65 ng/L).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available