4.5 Article

Barriers and Facilitators for Implementation of Individualized Fire Safety (IFS) in Sweden

Journal

FIRE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 57, Issue 5, Pages 2707-2736

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10694-021-01138-6

Keywords

Personalized fire safety; Vision zero; CFIR; Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research; Implementation research

Funding

  1. Swedish Fire Research Board (Brandforsk)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency has set a goal of zero fire deaths in Sweden by 2050, with a focus on implementing individualized fire safety guidelines for at-risk groups like older people. Research conducted with Swedish municipalities has shown varying degrees of implementation of these programs, with identified facilitators and barriers that can be leveraged for future improvements.
In 2010, the Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency (MSB) announced a vision zero of zero fire deaths in Sweden by 2050. Studies into fire deaths have identified that certain risk groups, including but not limited to older people, are overrepresented in fire death statistics in Sweden. The MSB has developed guidelines for how individualised fire safety (IFS) can be implemented in local communities for risk groups, in support of their vision zero for fire deaths. This paper presents the results of an interview study with a selection of Swedish municipalities to further explore how municipalities are working with IFS programs for community dwelling older people. The Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research has been used to analyse data developed through semi-structured interviews, from an analysis of the delegation of authority from MSB to local level and assessment of secondary documentation from national, regional and local organisations. The analysis has identified that IFS has, indeed, been implemented to varying degrees in Sweden, but that there are both facilitators and barriers which can be further leveraged to improve the implementation of IFS in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available