4.7 Article

Vasomotor and sexual symptoms in older Australian women: a cross-sectional study

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 105, Issue 1, Pages 149-+

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.09.017

Keywords

Vasomotor symptoms; older women; menopause

Funding

  1. Monash University Postgraduate Research Scholarship
  2. Australian NHMRC Principal Research Fellow grant
  3. International Menopause Society Research Bursary

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives: To determine the prevalence and severity of vasomotor symptoms (VMS) and sexual symptoms in community-dwelling older women, and to explore factors associated with VMS. Design: Population-based cross-sectional study. Setting: Not applicable. Participant(s): A total of 1,548 women aged 65-79 years. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcomes Measure(s): The presence and self-rated severity of VMS (hot flashes, night sweats, or sweating), and sexual symptoms (intimacy, desire, and vaginal dryness) were determined with the use of the Menopause Quality of Life (MenQOL) questionnaire. Result(s): All items of the vasomotor and the sexual MenQOL domains were completed by 1,532 and 1,361 of the study participants, respectively. Menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) use was reported by 6.2% of the women, and 6.9% reported using vaginal estrogen. Among the 1,426 women not using MHT, at least 1 VMS was reported by 32.8%. The prevalence of VMS rated as moderately to severely bothersome was 3.4%. A total of 54.4% of currently partnered women had sexual symptoms, and 32.5% reported vaginal dryness during intercourse in the past month. In the multivariate analysis, factors significantly associated with VMS were age, obesity, being a care-giver for another person, and bilateral oophorectomy. Conclusion(s): VMS and vaginal atrophy symptoms are common in community-dwelling older women, but they are predominantly untreated. The degree of distress caused by sexual symptoms among older women needs further exploration. (C) 2016 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available