4.7 Article

Overall efficiency of operational process with undesirable outputs containing both series and parallel processes: A SBM network DEA model

Journal

EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS
Volume 178, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115062

Keywords

Data Envelopment Analysis; Series and parallel network; Chinese commercial banks; SBM-NDEA model

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [71701111, 71701102]
  2. Key R&D Program of Shandong Province (Soft Science Project) [2020RZB01061]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper introduces a new SBM-NDEA model and applies it to evaluate Chinese commercial banks. The analysis shows that the overall inefficiency is mainly caused by the profit generating process. The results also suggest adjustments of variables for inefficient banks in the network process.
This paper proposes a new slacks-based measure network data envelopment analysis (SBM-NDEA) model with undesirable outputs to evaluate the performance of production processes that have complex structure containing both series and parallel processes. We demonstrate the proposed approach by evaluating Chinese commercial banks during 2012-2016. The operational process of these banks could be divided into deposit producing and deposit utilizing processes connected serially, while deposit utilizing process is further divided into profit generating and deposit reserve interest earning processes, which are parallel. The overall efficiency is decomposed into deposit producing and deposit utilizing efficiency. Deposit utilizing efficiency is further decomposed into profit generating and deposit reserve interest earning efficiency, respectively. Our empirical results suggest that the overall inefficiency is mainly from the profit generating process. The results also estimate the adjustment of variables for the network process of an inefficient bank.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available