4.1 Review

A critical review of the neurovascular nature of migraine and the main mechanisms of action of prophylactic antimigraine medications

Journal

EXPERT REVIEW OF NEUROTHERAPEUTICS
Volume 21, Issue 9, Pages 1035-1050

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2021.1968835

Keywords

Antimigraine prophylaxis; migraine; neurovascular axis; propranolol

Funding

  1. Fondo Sectorial de Investigacion para la Educacion' (CONACyT) [A1-S-23631]
  2. SEP-Cinvestav Research Support Fund [50]
  3. 'Direccion General de Investigacion y Posgrado' (UAA) [PIFF21-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Migraine involves neurovascular, functional, and anatomical alterations, and there is no ideal preventive medication currently. However, some prophylactic medications may help decrease the frequency of migraine days. The mechanisms of action involved in antimigraine prophylaxis remain elusive.
Introduction Migraine involves neurovascular, functional, and anatomical alterations. Migraineurs experience an intense unilateral and pulsatile headache frequently accompanied with vomiting, nausea, photophobia, etc. Although there is no ideal preventive medication, frequency in migraine days may be partially decreased by some prophylactics, including antihypertensives, antidepressants, antiepileptics, and CGRPergic inhibitors. However, the mechanisms of action involved in antimigraine prophylaxis remain elusive. Areas covered This review recaps some of the main neurovascular phenomena related to migraine and currently available preventive medications. Moreover, it discusses the major mechanisms of action of the recommended prophylactic medications. Expert opinion In the last three years, migraine prophylaxis has evolved from nonspecific to specific antimigraine treatments. Overall, nonspecific treatments mainly involve neural actions, whereas specific pharmacotherapy (represented by CGRP receptor antagonists and CGRPergic monoclonal antibodies) is predominantly mediated by neurovascular mechanisms that may include, among others: (i) reduction in the cortical spreading depression (CSD)-associated events; (ii) inhibition of pain sensitization; (iii) blockade of neurogenic inflammation; and/or (iv) increase in cranial vascular tone. Accordingly, the novel antimigraine prophylaxis promises to be more effective, devoid of significant adverse effects (unlike nonspecific treatments), and more beneficial for the quality of life of migraineurs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available