4.3 Article

Safety and tolerability evaluation of erenumab for the preventive treatment of migraine

Journal

EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY
Volume 20, Issue 8, Pages 867-876

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1933941

Keywords

Erenumab; AMG334; adverse events; migraine; safety

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review found no safety and tolerability concerns related to the use of erenumab in migraine treatment. The most common adverse events were local skin reactions and constipation, but there were no severe adverse events or frequent events leading to treatment discontinuation. Overall, treatment with erenumab was well tolerated.
Introduction: Erenumab, a monoclonal antibody targeting the receptor of calcitonin gene related peptide (CGRP), is the first disease-specific and mechanism-based treatment approved for the prevention of migraine. Although the safety and tolerability data from randomized trials are clear, the physiological effects of CGRP rise reasonable concerns. We aimed to evaluate the current evidence for safety and tolerability related to erenumab use in migraine. Areas covered: This review outlines the severe adverse events (AEs), common AEs, AEs leading to treatment discontinuation and AEs of special interest, reported in all phase 2, phase 3, open label, and observational studies with erenumab in migraine. Individual safety reports were also included in the systematic review of evidence. Expert opinion: No safety and tolerability flags were detected in this review. The most common AE are local skin reactions and constipation. No severe AEs, or frequent AEs leading to treatment discontinuation were detected. Treatment is well tolerated. The only AE of interest that may play a role in decision making and treatment monitoring is constipation. These findings are in line with previous safety reports, further highlighting the substantial tolerability and safety profile of the modern anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies for the prevention of migraine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available