4.6 Article

Culturing astrocytes on substrates that mimic brain tumors promotes enhanced mechanical forces

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
Volume 406, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2021.112751

Keywords

Astrocytes; Biomechanics; Brain tumors; Extracellular matrix; Stiffness

Funding

  1. University of Central Florida start-up funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biomechanical behavior of astrocytes is influenced by substrate stiffness, with increasing stiffness leading to higher intercellular stresses, strain energies, and tractions, while cell velocities decrease. This study sheds light on the importance of substrate stiffness on astrocytic function and could have implications for brain pathology and physiology research.
Astrocytes are essential to brain homeostasis and their dysfunction can have devastating consequences on human quality of life. Such deleterious effects are generally due in part to changes that occur at the cellular level, which may be biochemical or biomechanical in nature. One biomechanical change that can occur is a change in tissue stiffness. Brain tumors are generally associated with increased brain tissue stiffness, but the impact increased tissue stiffness has on astrocyte biomechanical behavior is poorly understood. Therefore, in this study we cultured human astrocytes on flexible substrates with stiffness that mimicked the healthy human brain (1 kPa), meningioma (4 kPa), and glioma (11 kPa) and investigated astrocyte biomechanical behavior by measuring cellsubstrate tractions, strain energies, cell-cell intercellular stresses, and cellular velocities. In general, tractions, intercellular stresses, and strain energy was observed to increase as a function of increased substrate stiffness, while cell velocities were observed to decrease with increased substrate stiffness. We believe this study will be of great importance to the fields of brain pathology and brain physiology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available