4.6 Article

Avelumab Combined with Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy in Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: The Phase 2 ICE-PAC Clinical Trial

Journal

EUROPEAN UROLOGY
Volume 81, Issue 3, Pages 253-262

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.08.011

Keywords

Castration-resistant; Checkpoint inhibitor; Immunotherapy; Metastasis-directed therapy; Prostate cancer; Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy; Stereotactic body radiation therapy

Funding

  1. NHMRC postgraduate scholarship
  2. Monash University postgraduate publications award
  3. Cancer Council Victoria postdoctoral fellowship
  4. NHMRC [GNT1098647]
  5. Victorian Cancer Agency clinical research fellowship [CRF14009]
  6. Astellas investigator-initiated grant
  7. Merck Healthcare Pty. Ltd., Australia, an affiliate of Merck KGaA (Darmstadt, Germany)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combining the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab with stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The results showed that this combination demonstrated encouraging activity and acceptable toxicity in treatment-refractory mCRPC, suggesting the potential for further investigations.
Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor monotherapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) has produced modest results. High-dose radiotherapy may be synergistic with checkpoint inhibitors. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab with stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) in mCRPC. Design, setting, and participants: From November 2017 to July 2019, this prospective phase 2 study enrolled 31 men with progressive mCRPC after at least one prior androgen receptor-directed therapy. Median follow-up was 18.0 mo. Intervention: Avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 wk for 24 wk (12 cycles). A single fraction of SABR (20 Gy) was administered to one or two disease sites within 5 d before the first and second avelumab treatments. Outcomes measurements and statistical analysis: The primary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR), defined as a confirmed complete or partial response of any duration, or stable disease/non-complete response/non-progressive disease for >= 6 mo (Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3-modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1). Secondary endpoints were the objective response rate (ORR). radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. DCR and ORR were calculated using the Clopper-Pearson exact binomial method. Results and limitations: Thirty-one evaluable men were enrolled (median age 71 yr, 71% with >= 2 prior mCRPC therapy lines, 81% with >5 total metastases). The DCR was 48% (15/31; 95% confidence interval [CI] 30-67%) and ORR was 31% (five of 16; 95% CI 11-59%). The ORR in nonirradiated lesions was 33% (four of 12; 95% CI 10-65%). Median rPFS was 8.4 mo (95% CI 4.5-not reached [NR]) and median OS was 14.1 mo (95% CI 8.9-NR). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events occurred in six patients (16%), with three (10%) requiring high-dose corticosteroid therapy. Plasma androgen receptor alterations were associated with lower DCR (22% vs 71%, p = 0.13; Fisher's exact test). Limitations include the small sample size and the absence of a control arm. Conclusions: Avelumab with SABR demonstrated encouraging activity and acceptable toxicity in treatment-refractory mCRPC. This combination warrants further investigation. Patient summary: In this study of men with advanced and heavily pretreated prostate cancer, combining stereotactic radiotherapy with avelumab immunotherapy was safe and resulted in nearly half of patients experiencing cancer control for 6 months or longer. Stereotactic radiotherapy may potentially improve the effectiveness of immunotherapy in prostate cancer. (C) 2021 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available