4.6 Article

Convalescent plasma for COVID-19 in hospitalised patients: an open-label, randomised clinical trial

Journal

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY SOC JOURNALS LTD
DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01471-2021

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio Grande do Sul (FAPERGS) [16/2551-0000242-8]
  2. Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado de Sao Paulo (FAPESP) [2020/06409-1, 2016/20045-7]
  3. Instituto Cultural Floresta

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the effect of convalescent plasma therapy in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The results showed that convalescent plasma therapy did not result in a higher proportion of clinical improvement compared to standard of care alone.
Background The effects of convalescent plasma (CP) therapy in hospitalised patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remain uncertain. This study investigates the effect of CP on clinical improvement in these patients. Methods This is an investigator-initiated, randomised, parallel arm, open-label, superiority clinical trial. Patients were randomly (1:1) assigned to two infusions of CP plus standard of care (SOC) or SOC alone. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with clinical improvement 28 days after enrolment. Results A total of 160 (80 in each arm) patients (66.3% critically ill, 33.7% severely ill) completed the trial. The median (interquartile range (IQR)) age was 60.5 (48-68) years; 58.1% were male and the median (IQR) time from symptom onset to randomisation was 10 (8-12) days. Neutralising antibody titres >1:80 were present in 133 (83.1%) patients at baseline. The proportion of patients with clinical improvement on day 28 was 61.3% in the CP+SOC group and 65.0% in the SOC group (difference -3.7%, 95% CI -18.8-11.3%). The results were similar in the severe and critically ill subgroups. There was no significant difference between CP+SOC and SOC groups in pre-specified secondary outcomes, including 28-day mortality, days alive and free of respiratory support and duration of invasive ventilatory support. Inflammatory and other laboratory marker values on days 3, 7 and 14 were similar between groups. Conclusions CP+SOC did not result in a higher proportion of clinical improvement on day 28 in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 compared to SOC alone.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available