Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Synthetic 2D Mammography Versus Standard 2D Digital Mammography: A Diagnostic Test Accuracy Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Peri Abdullah et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2021)
Performance of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis, Synthetic Mammography, and Digital Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Mostafa Alabousi et al.
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE (2021)
Accuracy and Effectiveness of Mammography versus Mammography and Tomosynthesis for Population-Based Breast Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Rodrigo Rosa Giampietro et al.
SCIENTIFIC REPORTS (2020)
Breast Cancer Conspicuity on Simultaneously Acquired Digital Mammographic Images versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Images
Katrina E. Korhonen et al.
RADIOLOGY (2019)
Performance of breast cancer screening using digital breast tomosynthesis: results from the prospective population-based Oslo Tomosynthesis Screening Trial
Per Skaane et al.
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT (2018)
Evidence on Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography Versus Digital Mammography When Using Tomosynthesis (Three-dimensional Mammography) for Population Breast Cancer Screening
Nehmat Houssami
CLINICAL BREAST CANCER (2018)
Prospective study aiming to compare 2D mammography and tomosynthesis plus synthesized mammography in terms of cancer detection and recall. From double reading of 2D mammography to single reading of tomosynthesis
Sara Romero Martin et al.
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY (2018)
One-view breast tomosynthesis versus two-view mammography in the Malmo Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Trial (MBTST): a prospective, population-based, diagnostic accuracy study
Sophia Zackrisson et al.
LANCET ONCOLOGY (2018)
Comparison of synthetic 2D images with planar and tomosynthesis imaging of the breast using a virtual clinical trial
Alistair Mackenzie et al.
MEDICAL IMAGING 2018: IMAGE PERCEPTION, OBSERVER PERFORMANCE, AND TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT (2018)
Local breast density assessment using reacquired mammographic images
Eloy Garcia et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY (2017)
Characterisation of noise and sharpness of images from four digital breast tomosynthesis systems for simulation of images for virtual clinical trials
Alistair Mackenzie et al.
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY (2017)
Clinical Performance of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography Combined with Tomosynthesis in a Large Screening Population
Mireille P. Aujero et al.
RADIOLOGY (2017)
Comparison of synthetic mammography, reconstructed from digital breast tomosynthesis, and digital mammography: evaluation of lesion conspicuity and BI-RADS assessment categories
Giovanna Mariscotti et al.
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT (2017)
Clinical implementation of synthesized mammography with digital breast tomosynthesis in a routine clinical practice
Phoebe E. Freer et al.
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT (2017)
MEDXVIEWER: PROVIDING A WEB-ENABLED WORKSTATION ENVIRONMENT FOR COLLABORATIVE AND REMOTE MEDICAL IMAGING VIEWING, PERCEPTION STUDIES AND READER TRAINING
P. T. Looney et al.
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY (2016)
Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT): a review of the evidence for use as a screening tool
Fiona J. Gilbert et al.
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY (2016)
Breast cancer screening with tomosynthesis (3D mammography) with acquired or synthetic 2D mammography compared with 2D mammography alone (STORM-2): a population-based prospective study
Daniela Bernardi et al.
LANCET ONCOLOGY (2016)
Assessing task performance in FFDM, DBT, and synthetic mammography using uniform and anthropomorphic physical phantoms
Lynda C. Ikejimba et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2016)
Implementation of Synthesized Two-dimensional Mammography in a Population-based Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening Program
Samantha P. Zuckerman et al.
RADIOLOGY (2016)
Accuracy of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Depicting Breast Cancer Subgroups in a UK Retrospective Reading Study (TOMMY Trial)
Fiona J. Gilbert et al.
RADIOLOGY (2015)
The Effect of Image Processing on the Detection of Cancers in Digital Mammography
Lucy M. Warren et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY (2014)
Comparison of Two-dimensional Synthesized Mammograms versus Original Digital Mammograms Alone and in Combination with Tomosynthesis Images
Margarita L. Zuley et al.
RADIOLOGY (2014)
Two-View Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Screening with Synthetically Reconstructed Projection Images: Comparison with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis with Full-Field Digital Mammographic Images
Per Skaane et al.
RADIOLOGY (2014)
Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study
Stefano Ciatto et al.
LANCET ONCOLOGY (2013)
Simulation and assessment of realistic breast lesions using fractal growth models
A. Rashidnasab et al.
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY (2013)
Two-View and Single-View Tomosynthesis versus Full-Field Digital Mammography: High-Resolution X-Ray Imaging Observer Study
Matthew G. Wallis et al.
RADIOLOGY (2012)
The simulation of 3D microcalcification clusters in 2D digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis
Eman Shaheen et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2011)
Evaluation of clinical image processing algorithms used in digital mammography
Federica Zanca et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2009)
A comparison of reconstruction algorithms for breast tomosynthesis
T Wu et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2004)
Observer studies involving detection and localization: Modeling, analysis, and validation
DP Chakraborty et al.
MEDICAL PHYSICS (2004)
Share Paper
