4.7 Article

Deep convolutional neural network for preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion and clinical outcomes in patients with HCCs

Journal

EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY
Volume 32, Issue 2, Pages 771-782

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08198-w

Keywords

Carcinoma; hepatocellular; Neural networks; Computer; Tomography; x-ray computed; Prognosis

Funding

  1. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2019A1515011269, 2021A1515011305]
  2. Clinical Research Startup Program of Southern Medical University byHigh-Level University Construction Funding of Guangdong Provincial Department of Education [LC2016PY034]
  3. Opening Research Fund of Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Molecular and Functional Imaging for Clinical Translation [201905010003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this large-scale study, three models for predicting MVI based on CECT (R, DCNN, and combined nomogram) showed different accuracy in the training and validation cohorts, and the combined nomogram outperformed the R model with significant differences. The three models for predicting MVI also demonstrated significant differences in DFS and OS.
Objectives We aimed to develop and validate a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) model for preoperative prediction of microvascular invasion (MVI) in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and its clinical outcomes using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) in a large population of candidates for surgery. Methods This retrospective study included 1116 patients with HCC who had undergone preoperative CECT and curative hepatectomy. Radiological (R), DCNN, and combined nomograms were constructed in a training cohort (n = 892) respectively based on clinicoradiological factors, DCNN probabilities, and all factors; the performance of each model was confirmed in a validation cohort (n = 244). Accuracy and the AUC to predict MVI were calculated. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) after surgery were recorded. Results The proportion of MVI-positive patients was respectively 38.8% (346/892) and 35.7 % (87/244) in the training and validation cohorts. The AUCs of the R, DCNN, and combined nomograms were respectively 0.809, 0.929, and 0.940 in the training cohorts and 0.837, 0.865, and 0.897 in the validation cohort. The combined nomogram outperformed the R nomogram in the training (p < 0.001) and validation (p = 0.009) cohorts. There was a significant difference in DFS and OS between the R, DCNN, and combined nomogram-predicted groups with and without MVI (p < 0.001). Conclusions The combined nomogram based on preoperative CECT performs well for preoperative prediction of MVI and outcome.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available