4.7 Article

Reheating in small-field inflation on the brane: the swampland criteria and observational constraints in light of the PLANCK 2018 results

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
Volume 81, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09283-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CONICYT Chile, scholarship ANID-PFCHA/Doctorado Nacional [2018-21181476]
  2. FONDECYT Grant [11170162]
  3. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT), Portugal [UIDB/00099/2020]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Research on cosmological inflation and its dynamics within the Randall-Sundrum II brane model, analyzing four representative small-field inflationary potentials, constraining parameters for a viable inflationary Universe, investigating consistency with the Swampland Criteria, and providing predictions for reheating duration and temperature.
We study cosmological inflation and its dynamics in the framework of the Randall-Sundrum II brane model. In particular, we analyze in detail four representative small-field inflationary potentials, namely Natural inflation, Hilltop inflation, Higgs-like inflation, and Exponential SUSY inflation, each characterized by two mass scales. We constrain the parameters for which a viable inflationary Universe emerges using the latest PLANCK results. Furthermore, we investigate whether or not those models in brane cosmology are consistent with the recently proposed Swampland Criteria, and give predictions for the duration of reheating as well as for the reheating temperature after inflation. Our results show that (i) the distance conjecture is satisfied, (ii) the de Sitter conjecture and its refined version may be avoided, and (iii) the allowed range for the five-dimensional Planck mass, M-5, is found to be 10(5) TeV less than or similar to M-5 less than or similar to 10(12) TeV. Our main findings indicate that non-thermal leptogenesis cannot work within the framework of RS-II brane cosmology, at least for the inflationary potentials considered here.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available