4.7 Article

Regularization ambiguity and van der Waals black hole in 2+1 dimensions

Journal

EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL C
Volume 81, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1140/epjc/s10052-021-09301-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fondecyt (Chile) [1180178]
  2. ANID PIA/APOYO [AFB180002]
  3. project Evaporation of microscopic black holes of the German Research Foundation (DFG) [NI 1282/3-1]
  4. Helmholtz International Center for FAIR within the framework of the LOEWE program (Landesoffensive zur Entwicklung Wissenschaftlich-okonomischer Exzellenz)
  5. GNFM
  6. Italian National Group for Mathematical Physics

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper presents a method to address the limitations of charged black holes in (2 + 1)-dimensional anti-de Sitter space-time, by extending the parameter space of the BTZ geometry and properly identifying integration constants. The result is a well-defined internal energy, consistent with the Area Law, corresponding to a van der Waals gas.
Charged black holes in a (2 + 1)-dimensional anti-de Sitter space-time suffer from some limitations such as the ambiguity in the definition of the mass and the bad short distance behavior. In this paper we present a way to resolve such issues. By extending the parameter space of the BTZ geometry, we properly identify the integration constants in order to remove the conical singularity sitting at the origin. In such a way we obtain a well defined Minkowski limit and horizons also in the case of de Sitter background space. On the thermodynamic side, we obtain a proper internal energy, by invoking the consistency with the Area Law, even if the mass parameter does not appear in the metric coefficients. As a further improvement, we show that it is sufficient to assume a finite size of the electric charge to obtain a short scale regular geometry. The resulting solution, generalizing the charged BTZ metric, is dual to a van der Waals gas.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available