Post-pubertal effects of the Alt-RAMEC/FM and RME/FM protocols for the early treatment of Class III malocclusion: a retrospective controlled study

Objective: To assess the stability of the effects of the modified Alt-RAMEC and facial mask (FM) protocol at a post-pubertal observation. Methods: Twenty-one Class III patients (11 males and 10 females, 6.5 +/- 0.7 years) treated consecutively with the Alt-RAMEC/FM approach and presenting with lateral cephalograms taken before treatment (T1), after treatment (T2), and at post-pubertal observations (T3) were compared with 22 Class III patients (9 males and 13 females, 6.9 +/- 1.2 years) treated with the rapid maxillary expansion (RME) and FM protocol and with 15 Class III untreated subjects (7 males and 8 females, 6.2 +/- 2.2 years). At T3, all patients showed a post-pubertal skeletal maturation stage (CS4-CS6). Descriptive statistics and statistical comparisons between the three groups at T1 and for the T3-T1, T2-T1, and T3-T2 changes were assessed by means of the ANOVA or Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: During the overall observation period, Alt-RAMEC/FM and RME/FM protocols produced statistically significant favourable effects when compared with the Control group (ANB + 2.8 degrees and +2.2 degrees, respectively; Wits appraisal +4.4 mm and +2.7 mm, respectively). No statistically significant differences were found between the outcomes of the Alt-RAMEC/FM and RME/FM protocols neither at the post-pubertal or short-term observations. Limitations: Retrospective study and the comparison with an historical control sample of subjects with untreated Class III malocclusion. Conclusions: The Alt-RAMEC/FM protocol cannot be recommended as the approach of choice for the therapy of Class III dentoskeletal disharmony in very young subjects compared to the conventional RME/FM protocol.

Automated summary

This study assessed the stability of the effects of the Alt-RAMEC and facial mask protocol at a post-pubertal observation. The results showed that the Alt-RAMEC/FM protocol produced favorable effects compared to the control group. There were no significant differences between the outcomes of the Alt-RAMEC/FM and RME/FM protocols at the post-pubertal or short-term observations.