4.7 Article

Polynomial-size formulations and relaxations for the quadratic multiple knapsack problem

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 291, Issue 3, Pages 871-882

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2020.10.047

Keywords

Combinatorial optimization; Quadratic multiple knapsack; Binary quadratic programming; Lagrangian relaxation; Reformulation linearization technique

Funding

  1. Air Force Office of Scientific Research [FA8655-20-1-7012]
  2. National Agency for Research and Development (ANID)/Scholarship Program/Doctorado Becas Chile [2018-72190600]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Quadratic Multiple Knapsack Problem generalizes two well-known combinatorial optimization problems and proposes polynomial-size linear models and upper bounds. Surrogate and Lagrangian relaxations are used, and the effectiveness of the Lagrangian relaxation is compared when applied to a quadratic formulation and a Level 1 reformulation linearization. The proposed methods are evaluated through extensive computational experiments.
The Quadratic Multiple Knapsack Problem generalizes, simultaneously, two well-known combinatorial optimization problems that have been intensively studied in the literature: the (single) Quadratic Knapsack Problem and the Multiple Knapsack Problem. The only exact algorithm for its solution uses a formulation based on an exponential-size number of variables, that is solved via a Branch-and-Price algorithm. This work studies polynomial-size formulations and upper bounds. We derive linear models from classical reformulations of 0-1 quadratic programs and analyze theoretical properties and dominances among them. We define surrogate and Lagrangian relaxations, and we compare the effectiveness of the Lagrangian relaxation when applied to a quadratic formulation and to a Level 1 reformulation linearization that leads to a decomposable structure. The proposed methods are evaluated through extensive computational experiments. (C) 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available