4.7 Article

Dynamic marketing policies with rating-sensitive consumers: A mean-field games approach

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 299, Issue 3, Pages 1079-1093

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2021.08.031

Keywords

Game theory; Product rating; Marketing; Pricing; Mean-field games

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, we analyze a large group of consumers who rely on past purchasers' ratings to evaluate the product and make purchasing decisions. We model the problem as a Stackelberg mean-field game and provide a numerical scheme to compute optimal pricing, marketing activities, aggregate rating, and market share. Our findings demonstrate the usefulness of comparing fairness among different rating aggregators and the predictability of herd behavior triggered by biased raters.
We consider a large group of consumers who decide whether or not to buy a durable good offered by a firm. Without previous experience with the product, consumers rely on the ratings of past purchasers to evaluate the product goodwill and make optimal decisions. The consumers have heterogeneous in-trinsic rating behaviors and preferences. For example, the population may include avid fans who tend to purchase at early stages and over-rate the product. What are the firm's optimal pricing and marketing strategies in the face of such heterogeneous market? To answer this question, we model the problem as a Stackelberg mean-field game, with the firm acting as leader and the consumers as followers. We de-termine the conditions under which a Stackelberg equilibrium exists and provide a numerical scheme to compute the optimal prices, marketing activities, aggregate rating, and market share. We provide some numerical examples to illustrate the type of insights that can be obtained with our model. For instance, we show that it is useful to compare the fairness of different rating aggregators, and can anticipate herd-ing behavior triggered by biased raters. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available