Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING
Volume 48, Issue 13, Pages 4396-4414Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-021-05475-0
Keywords
Fibroblast activation protein alpha; FAPI-PET Imaging; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; PET; CT
Funding
- AIRC (Italian Association for Cancer Research) [2019-23596]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Fibroblast activation protein-alpha (FAP alpha) is a promising target for therapeutic and molecular imaging applications due to its overexpression on cancer-associated fibroblasts in most epithelial neoplasms. [68]Ga-labelled radiopharmaceuticals-FAP-inhibitors (FAPI)-have shown potential in PET imaging for staging, restaging, and radiation treatment planning in various cancers. High heterogeneity was observed in lesion-based analysis, while promising results were seen in patient-based analysis, particularly for primary lesions and distant metastases.
Introduction Fibroblast activation protein-alpha (FAP alpha) is overexpressed on cancer-associated fibroblasts in approximately 90% of epithelial neoplasms, representing an appealing target for therapeutic and molecular imaging applications. [(68) Ga]Ga-labelled radiopharmaceuticals-FAP-inhibitors (FAPI)-have been developed for PET. We systematically reviewed and meta-analysed published literature to provide an overview of its clinical role. Materials and methods The search, limited to January 1st, 2018-March 31st, 2021, was performed on MedLine and Embase databases using all the possible combinations of terms FAP, FAPI, PET/CT, positron emission tomography, fibroblast, cancer-associated fibroblasts, CAF, molecular imaging, and fibroblast imaging. Study quality was assessed using the QUADAS-2 criteria. Patient-based and lesion-based pooled sensitivities/specificities of FAPI PET were computed using a random-effects model directly from the STATA metaprop command. Between-study statistical heterogeneity was tested (I-2-statistics). Results Twenty-three studies were selected for systematic review. Investigations on staging or restaging head and neck cancer (n = 2, 29 patients), abdominal malignancies (n = 6, 171 patients), various cancers (n = 2, 143 patients), and radiation treatment planning (n = 4, 56 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. On patient-based analysis, pooled sensitivity was 0.99 (95% CI 0.97-1.00) with negligible heterogeneity; pooled specificity was 0.87 (95% CI 0.62-1.00), with negligible heterogeneity. On lesion-based analysis, sensitivity and specificity had high heterogeneity (I-2 = 88.56% and I-2 = 97.20%, respectively). Pooled sensitivity for the primary tumour was 1.00 (95% CI 0.98-1.00) with negligible heterogeneity. Pooled sensitivity/specificity of nodal metastases had high heterogeneity (I-2 = 89.18% and I-2 = 95.74%, respectively). Pooled sensitivity in distant metastases was good (0.93 with 95% CI 0.88-0.97) with negligible heterogeneity. Conclusions FAPI-PET appears promising, especially in imaging cancers unsuitable for [F-18]FDG imaging, particularly primary lesions and distant metastases. However, high-level evidence is needed to define its role, specifically to identify cancer types, non-oncological diseases, and clinical settings for its applications.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available