4.7 Article

First-line therapies in late-onset multiple sclerosis: An Italian registry study

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 28, Issue 12, Pages 4117-4123

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/ene.15006

Keywords

first choice; injectable disease-modifying therapies; late onset; multiple sclerosis; oral disease-modifying therapies

Funding

  1. Universita degli Studi di Catania within the CRUI-CARE Agreement
  2. WOA Institution: Universita degli Studi di Catania
  3. Blended DEAL: CARE

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study compared the effectiveness of injectable and oral first-line therapies in patients with late-onset relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (LORRMS), and found no significant differences in controlling outcomes between the two treatments. This suggests that both injectables and oral first-line therapies are similarly effective in managing LORRMS.
Background and purpose The diagnosis of late-onset (age >= 50 years old) relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (LORRMS) has been increasingly described in clinical practice, whereas data focusing on the specific therapeutic management of LORRMS are scarce. Our objective was to compare the effectiveness of injectable and oral first-line disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) in a cohort of LORRMS patients with time to first relapse, time to confirmed disability progression (CDP), and time to discontinuation. Methods This is a multicenter, observational, retrospectively acquired cohort study on LORRMS-naive patients from the Italian MS Register who started either injectable or oral first-line DMTs between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2017. LORRMS patients were divided into two groups, namely the injectable group (IG) and oral group (OG). Cox models adjusted with inverse probability-weighted propensity score were built for the investigated outcomes. Results Of a cohort of 3989 patients, 302 were enrolled (203 in the IG and 99 in the OG). The two cohorts did not differ in baseline characteristics. Time to first relapse did not show any difference between the two groups (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.50-2.46, p = 0.797). Furthermore, no differences were found between the two groups with respect to the risk of CDP (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.35-3.06, p = 0.939), nor for the risk of DMT discontinuation (HR: 0.90; 95% CI: 0.17-2.08, p = 0.425). Conclusions Real-world data from the Italian MS Register suggested that both injectables and oral first-line DMTs similarly controlled the investigated outcomes in LORRMS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available