4.5 Article

A note on the stability characteristics of the respiratory events

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS B-FLUIDS
Volume 89, Issue -, Pages 15-20

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechflu.2021.05.001

Keywords

Instability; Rayleigh-Taylor; Kelvin-Helmholtz; Sneezing; Respiratory events; COVID-19

Funding

  1. Department of Science and Technology - INSPIRE Faculty Award/Batch-12/2017, India, Government of India [IFA17-ENG220]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study analyzes the instability mechanism responsible for forming droplets and aerosols during respiratory events, proposing a mathematical framework and suggesting the Rayleigh-Taylor-Kelvin-Helmholtz model as a powerful tool. It highlights the possibility of respiratory droplet formation over multiple instabilities and provides a fundamental understanding.
The present outbreak enables the researchers from fluid mechanics to widen the understanding of expelling respiratory liquids from a unique perspective to diminish the persistence of COVID-19. This article focuses on uncovering the instability mechanism responsible for forming droplets and aerosols during respiratory events such as breathing, talking, coughing and sneezing. We illustrate a mathematical framework by revisiting the model (Vadivukkarasan and Panchagnula, 2017) and show the associated instabilities during respiratory events. We envisage the combined Rayleigh-Taylor-Kelvin-Helmholtz (R-T-K-H) model as a robust tool for respiratory events. This study highlights the distinct possibility of respiratory droplet formation over multiple instabilities and provides a fundamental understanding. We present the different dominant modes through a ternary phase diagram for three-dimensional numbers (Bond number and Weber numbers). Furthermore, this model can be extended phenomenologically to viscous fluids to satisfy mucus and saliva in the respiratory liquids. (C) 2021 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available