4.7 Article

Nonlocal integral static problems of nanobeams resting on an elastic foundation

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MECHANICS A-SOLIDS
Volume 89, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.euromechsol.2021.104295

Keywords

Nonlocal elasticity; Integral equations; Beams; FEM; Pasternak elastic foundation

Categories

Funding

  1. European Union (European Social FundESF) through the Operational Programme 'Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning' [MIS5033021]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explores the analysis of static engineering problems of a nanobeam using nonlocal integral elasticity models. The results show that the integral models exhibit a flexible behavior compared to classic and nonlocal differential models, demonstrating good physical robustness and promising applications in the field of nanomaterials and beyond.
Eringen's nonlocal theory has been widely used for the study of micro-and nano-structures exhibiting size effect phenomena. Eringen's nonlocal differential constitutive equation has been employed to structural engineering applications, and a number of inconsistencies and paradoxes has been raised. This work centers on exploring static engineering benchmark problems of a nanobeam resting on a Pasternak-type elastic foundation by means of the nonlocal integral elasticity for the first time. The modified kernel's model and the two phase stress model leading to well-posed problems are used. The static responses of the integral models show to have a flexible behavior in comparison with those of the classic and the nonlocal differential models for all the investigated problems. Neither paradoxes nor inconsistencies are raised for the integral models. The modified kernel highlights the model's robustness from a physical point of view. The conclusions are promising to spur the applications of nanomaterials, nanocomposites and biomaterials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available