4.6 Review

Sarcopenia measurement in research and clinical practice

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
Volume 90, Issue -, Pages 1-9

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejim.2021.06.003

Keywords

Aged; 80 and over; Sarcopenia; Geriatric assessment; methods

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [GNT1112672, GNT1123014, GNT1174886]
  2. NWO/ZonMw Veni fellowship [91618067]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sarcopenia is a disease associated with accelerated loss of skeletal muscle and decline in functional capacity, primarily managed and prevented through exercise prescription and nutritional strategies. Various diagnostic and case-finding tools like EWGSOP, AWGS, FNIH, and SDOC are used to assess age-related sarcopenia, focusing on criteria such as muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical functioning/performance.
Sarcopenia is a disease related to accelerated loss of skeletal muscle and subsequent decline in functional capacity. It affects approximately 13% of the world's population aged over 60 years. Sarcopenia is primarily managed and prevented through a combination of exercise prescription combined with appropriate nutritional strategies. This review outlines diagnostic and case finding/screening tools for age-related (primary) sarcopenia used in research and clinical practice. Diagnostic tools critically reviewed include those of the: European Workgroup for Sarcopenia (EWGSOP) versions 1 and 2; Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia (AWGS) versions 1 and 2; Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH); and the Sarcopenia Definition and Outcomes Consortium (SDOC). Criteria used by diagnostic tools (muscle mass, muscle strength and physical functioning/ performance) are also detailed. Case-finding tools include the SARC-F questionnaire, Ishii's formula and Goodman's screening grid. Additionally, this review discusses the strengths and weaknesses of each diagnostic and case-finding tool, and examines their ability to reliably predict adverse clinical outcomes and patient responses to potential therapies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available