Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Exploration of experiences with and understanding of polygenic risk scores for bipolar disorder
Sophie Putt et al.
JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS (2020)
Women's responses and understanding of polygenic breast cancer risk information
T. Yanes et al.
FAMILIAL CANCER (2020)
Impute.me: An Open-Source, Non-profit Tool for Using Data From Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing to Calculate and Interpret Polygenic Risk Scores
Lasse Folkersen et al.
FRONTIERS IN GENETICS (2020)
The Feelings About genomiC Testing Results (FACToR) Questionnaire: Development and Preliminary Validation
Meng Li et al.
JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING (2019)
Proprietary Algorithms for Polygenic Risk: Protecting Scientific Innovation or Hiding the Lack of It?
A. Cecile J. W. Janssens
GENES (2019)
Making Sense of SNPs: Women's Understanding and Experiences of Receiving a Personalized Profile of Their Breast Cancer Risks
Mary-Anne Young et al.
JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING (2018)
Consumer use and response to online third-party raw DNA interpretation services
Catharine Wang et al.
MOLECULAR GENETICS & GENOMIC MEDICINE (2018)
The personal and clinical utility of polygenic risk scores
Ali Torkamani et al.
NATURE REVIEWS GENETICS (2018)
A Systematic Review of the Psychological Implications of Genetic Testing: A Comparative Analysis Among Cardiovascular, Neurodegenerative and Cancer Diseases
Serena Oliveri et al.
FRONTIERS IN GENETICS (2018)
Behavioural changes, sharing behaviour and psychological responses after receiving direct-to-consumer genetic test results: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Kelly F. J. Stewart et al.
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY GENETICS (2018)
Prospects for using risk scores in polygenic medicine
Cathryn M. Lewis et al.
GENOME MEDICINE (2017)
Internet-Based Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Systematic Review
Loredana Covolo et al.
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH (2015)
The psychological impact of undergoing genetic-risk profiling in men with a family history of prostate cancer
Elizabeth K. Bancroft et al.
PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY (2015)
Communicating Genetic Risk Information for Common Disorders in the Era of Genomic Medicine
Denise M. Lautenbach et al.
ANNUAL REVIEW OF GENOMICS AND HUMAN GENETICS, VOL 14 (2013)
It's Not Like Judgment Day: Public Understanding of and Reactions to Personalized Genomic Risk Information
Erynn S. Gordon et al.
JOURNAL OF GENETIC COUNSELING (2012)
Motivations and Perceptions of Early Adopters of Personalized Genomics: Perspectives from Research Participants
S. E. Gollust et al.
PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS (2012)
Effect of Direct-to-Consumer Genomewide Profiling to Assess Disease Risk.
Cinnamon S. Bloss et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2011)
Users' motivations to purchase direct-to-consumer genome-wide testing: an exploratory study of personal stories
Yeyang Su et al.
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY GENETICS (2011)
Research electronic data capture (REDCap)-A metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support
Paul A. Harris et al.
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS (2009)
A systematic review of perceived risks, psychological and behavioral impacts of genetic testing
Jodi T. Heshka et al.
GENETICS IN MEDICINE (2008)
Share Paper
