4.3 Article

Second-generation antipsychotic use during pregnancy and risk of congenital malformations

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 77, Issue 11, Pages 1737-1745

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00228-021-03169-y

Keywords

Pregnancy; Second-generation antipsychotics; Major congenital malformations

Funding

  1. University of Helsinki
  2. Finnish Medicines Agency (FIMEA)
  3. Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL)
  4. Social Insurance Institution in Finland (Kela)
  5. Helsinki University
  6. Helsinki University Hospital, Department of Emergency care, Helsinki, Finland
  7. Helsinki University Central Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the use of second-generation antipsychotics (S-GA) during early pregnancy was not associated with an increased risk of overall congenital malformations. However, the use of olanzapine was specifically linked to an increased risk of major congenital malformations, especially musculoskeletal malformations.
Purpose To study if second-generation antipsychotic (S-GA) use during the first trimester of pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of major congenital malformations (MCM). Methods A population-based birth cohort study using national register data extracted from the Drugs and Pregnancy database in Finland, years 1996-2017. The sampling frame included 1,273,987 pregnant women. We included singleton pregnancies ending in live or stillbirth or termination of pregnancy due to severe malformation. Pregnancies with exposure to known teratogens were excluded. Women were categorized into three groups: exposed to S-GAs (n = 3478), exposed to first-generation antipsychotics (F-GAs) (n = 1030), and unexposed (no purchases of S-GAs or F-GAs during pregnancy, n = 22,540). We excluded genetic conditions and compared the prevalence of MCMs in S-GA users to the two comparison groups using multiple logistic regression models. Results Use of S-GAs during early pregnancy was not associated with an increased risk of overall MCMs compared to unexposed (adjusted odds ratio, OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.72-1.19) or to F-GA users (OR 0.82; 95% CI 0.56-1.20). Of individual S-GAs, olanzapine use was associated with an increased risk of overall MCMs (OR 2.12; 95% CI 1.19-3.76), and specifically, an increased risk of musculoskeletal malformations (OR 3.71; 95% CI 1.35-10.1) when compared to unexposed, while comparisons to F-GA users did not show significant results. Conclusions Olanzapine use is associated with an increased risk of major congenital malformations and specifically, musculoskeletal malformations. Use during pregnancy should be restricted to situations where no safer alternatives exist.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available