4.7 Article

Original Research Preference for the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer (PHranceSCa): A randomised, open-label phase II study

Journal

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 152, Issue -, Pages 223-232

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.047

Keywords

Pertuzumab; Trastuzumab; Early breast cancer; Adjuvant; Subcutaneous; Fixed dose; Patient-reported outcomes; Patient preference; Healthcare resource; Quality of life

Categories

Funding

  1. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that the majority of patients prefer the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection over intravenous infusion, citing reasons such as reduced clinic time and comfort during administration. Most patients were very satisfied/satisfied with subcutaneous injection and preferred to continue with it, and healthcare professionals perceived shorter treatment room times for subcutaneous injections compared to intravenous infusions. Overall, the subcutaneous injection option was well tolerated with no new safety concerns, providing a quicker alternative to intravenous infusion.
Aim: The aim of the study was to assess patient preference for the fixed-dose combination of pertuzumab and trastuzumab for subcutaneous injection (PH FDC SC) in patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer in PHranceSCa (NCT03674112). Materials and methods: Patients who completed neoadjuvant P + H + chemotherapy + surgery were randomised 1:1 to three intravenous (IV) P + H cycles followed by three cycles of PH FDC SC or vice versa (crossover) and then chose subcutaneous (SC) injection or IV infusion to continue up to 18 cycles (continuation). Assessments were via patient and healthcare professional (HCP) questionnaires. Results: One hundred and sixty patients were randomised (cut-off: 24 February 2020); 136 (85.0%, 95% confidence interval: 78.5-90.2%) preferred SC; 22 (13.8% ) preferred IV; 2 (1.3 %) had no preference. The main reasons for SC preference were reduced clinic time (n = 119) and comfort during administration (n = 73). One hundred and forty-one patients (88.1%) were very satisfied/satisfied with SC injection versus 108 (67.5%) with IV infusion; 86.9% chose PH FDC SC continuation. HCP perceptions of median patient treatment room time ranged from 33.0-50.0 min with SC and 130.0-300.0 min with IV. Most adverse events (AEs) were grade 1/2 (no 4/5s); serious AE rates were low. AE rates before and after switching were similar (cycles 1-3 IV-> cycles 4-6 SC: 77.5%-> 72.5%; cycles 1-3 SC-> cycles 4-6 IV: 77.5%-> 63.8%). Conclusion: Most patients strongly preferred PH FDC SC over P + H IV. PH FDC SC was generally well tolerated, with no new safety signals (even when switching), and offers a quicker alternative to IV infusion. 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available