Journal
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 150, Issue -, Pages 250-259Publisher
ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.03.036
Keywords
Metastatic pancreatic cancer; Overall survival; Relapse patterns; Lung metastasis; Liver metastasis
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Isolated pulmonary metastasis, low tumor grading, low postoperative CA 19-9 levels, completeness of adjuvant gemcitabine-based treatment, number of relapse sites, and type of palliative first-line treatment are significant factors affecting overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with recurrent pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. The site of relapse and other prognostic factors may help stratify patients for future clinical trials and could impact subsequent survival. Further research is needed to identify differences in tumor biology and relapse patterns, reflecting the varying survival outcomes in PDAC patients.
Background: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents one of the most fatal malignancies worldwide. It is suggested that survival in PDAC depends, among other things, on pattern of disease recurrence. Patients and methods: We performed a pooled analysis of the adjuvant therapy studies CONKO-001, CONKO-005, and CONKO-006, including a total of 912 patients with regard to prognostic factors in patients with recurrent disease. Overall survival from disease recurrence (OS 2) and disease-free survival (DFS) from the day of surgery were expressed by Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank testing and Cox regression. Results: Of 912 patients treated within the previously mentioned CONKO trials, we identified 689 patients with disease recurrence and defined site of relapse. In multivariable analysis, the presence of isolated pulmonary metastasis, low tumour grading, and low postoperative level of & nbsp; CA 19-9 remained significant factors for improved OS 2 and DFS. Furthermore, completeness of adjuvant gemcitabine-based treatment (OS 2: P = 0.006), number of relapse sites (OS 2: P = 0.015), and type of palliative first-line treatment (OS 2: P < 0.001) significantly affected overall survival after disease recurrence in PDAC. Conclusions: Determining tumour subgroups using prognostic factors may be helpful to strat-ify PDAC patients for future clinical trials. In case of disease recurrence, the site of relapse may have a prognostic impact on subsequent survival. Further investigations are needed to identify differences in tumour biology, reflecting relapse patterns and the differing survival of PDAC patients. (c)& nbsp;2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available