4.7 Review

Understanding the genetics of adult-onset dilated cardiomyopathy: what a clinician needs to know

Journal

EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL
Volume 42, Issue 24, Pages 2384-2396

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab286

Keywords

Genetics; Dilated cardiomyopathy; Heart

Funding

  1. National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College London
  2. Wellcome Trust [107469/Z/15/Z]
  3. Medical Research Council (UK)
  4. NIHR Royal Brompton Biomedical Research Unit
  5. NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre
  6. Rosetrees Trust
  7. Alexander Jansons Foundation
  8. CORDA
  9. British Heart Foundation
  10. Netherlands Cardiovascular Research Initiative
  11. Dutch Heart Foundation
  12. CVON Early HFPEF [2015-10]
  13. She-PREDICTS [2017-21]
  14. Arena-PRIME [2017-18]
  15. Wellcome Trust [107469/Z/15/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review provides a practical primer for clinicians on the genetic basis of dilated cardiomyopathy, including the clinical relevance, key genetic concepts, which patients may benefit from genetic testing, common genetic tests performed, how to interpret genetic results, and the clinical applications. Areas for future research in this dynamic field are also discussed.
There is increasing understanding of the genetic basis to dilated cardiomyopathy and in this review, we offer a practical primer for the practising clinician. We aim to help all clinicians involved in the care of patients with dilated cardiomyopathy to understand the clinical relevance of the genetic basis of dilated cardiomyopathy, introduce key genetic concepts, explain which patients and families may benefit from genetic testing, which genetic tests are commonly performed, how to interpret genetic results, and the clinical applications of results. We conclude by reviewing areas for future research in this dynamic field. [GRAPHICS] .

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available