4.5 Review

Diagnostic instruments for the assessment of disruptive mood dysregulation disorder: a systematic review of the literature

Journal

EUROPEAN CHILD & ADOLESCENT PSYCHIATRY
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 17-39

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00787-021-01840-4

Keywords

Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder; Irritability; Diagnostics; Measurement; Systematic review of the literature

Ask authors/readers for more resources

There are various diagnostic instruments available for assessing DMDD, with good reliability. However, there is a lack of reporting on psychometric properties. Further research and refinement of recently developed DMDD interviews are needed to establish the validity of the diagnosis.
Disruptive mood dysregulation disorder (DMDD) involves non-episodic irritability and frequent severe temper outbursts in children. Since the inclusion of the diagnosis in the DSM-5, there is no established gold-standard in the assessment of DMDD. In this systematic review of the literature, we provide a synopsis of existing diagnostic instruments for DMDD. Bibliographic databases were searched for any studies assessing DMDD. The systematic search of the literature yielded K = 1167 hits, of which n = 110 studies were included. The most frequently used measure was the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia DMDD module (25%). Other studies derived diagnostic criteria from interviews not specifically designed to measure DMDD (47%), chart review (7%), clinical diagnosis without any specific instrument (6%) or did not provide information about the assessment (9%). Three structured interviews designed to diagnose DMDD were used in six studies (6%). Interrater reliability was reported in 36% of studies (ranging from kappa = 0.6-1) while other psychometric properties were rarely reported. This systematic review points to a variety of existing diagnostic measures for DMDD with good reliability. Consistent reporting of psychometric properties of recently developed DMDD interviews, as well as their further refinement, may help to ascertain the validity of the diagnosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available