4.5 Article

Discrepancies between UICC and AJCC TNM classifications for oral cavity tumors in the 8th editions and following versions

Journal

EUROPEAN ARCHIVES OF OTO-RHINO-LARYNGOLOGY
Volume 279, Issue 1, Pages 527-531

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-06964-6

Keywords

AJCC; UICC; TNM; Oral cavity; Discrepancies

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study highlighted the discrepancies between UICC and AJCC TNM classifications in oral cavity cancer, with the key update being the introduction of depth of infiltration which is associated with the proximity of the tumor to lymphovascular tissues and nodal metastases. Different versions of the TNM classification can be confusing for the scientific community, and clinicians and researchers are advised to always refer to the latest updates of each classification.
Purpose To underline discrepancies between the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) and the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Tumor-Node-Metastasis (TNM) classifications in oral cavity cancer. Methods Comparison between the UICC and AJCC TNM classifications of oral cavity cancer in their 8th editions and following versions. Results The most important update was the introduction of the depth of infiltration (DOI), which reflects the proximity of the tumor to the underlying lymphovascular tissues and was associated to the presence of nodal metastases. Since the first publication of the 8th edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual on March 30, 2017, two further versions have been published, while the UICC TNM classification was left unchanged until a document containing modifications to the 8th edition of the UICC TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours was published online on October 6, 2020. Conclusion Different versions of the TNM classification can be confounding for the scientific community. Citing the 8th edition of the UICC TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours or the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual without specifying the precise version used for classification may be insufficient. Clinicians and researchers are invited to always refer to the latest update of each classification.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available