4.7 Article

Is the effect of premature elevated progesterone augmented by human chorionic gonadotropin versus gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist trigger?

Journal

FERTILITY AND STERILITY
Volume 106, Issue 3, Pages 584-+

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.04.024

Keywords

Elevated progesterone; IVF; ART; hCG trigger; GnRH agonist trigger

Funding

  1. Intramural research program of the Program in Reproductive and Adult Endocrinology, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To compare the effect of P on live birth rate between hCG and GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) trigger cycles. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Large private assisted reproductive technology (ART) practice. Patient(s): A total of 3,326 fresh autologous ART cycles. Intervention(s): None. Main Outcome Measure(s): Live birth. Result(s): A total of 647 GnRH-a trigger cycles were compared with 2,679 hCG trigger cycles. Live birth was negatively associated with P in both the hCG trigger (odds ratio [OR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.76) and the agonist trigger cohorts (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.45-0.69). Interaction testing evaluating P and trigger medication was not significant, indicating that P had a similar negative effect on live birth rates in both cohorts. Progesterone >= 2 ng/mL occurred more commonly in GnRH-a trigger cycles compared with hCG trigger cycles (5.5% vs. 3.1%) and was negatively associated with live birth in both the hCG trigger (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.11-0.73) and agonist trigger cohorts (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.14-0.90). When P >= 2 ng/mL, the live birth rates were poor and similar in the hCG and GnRH-a cohorts (5.9% vs. 14.2%), indicating that P >= 2 ng/mL had a similar negative effect on live birth in both cohorts. Conclusion(s): Elevated serum P on the day of hCG was negatively associated with live birth rates in both hCG and GnRH-a trigger cycles. (C) 2016 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available