4.5 Article

Identification of a Seasonal Subsurface Oxygen Minimum in Rivers Inlet, British Columbia

Journal

ESTUARIES AND COASTS
Volume 45, Issue 3, Pages 754-771

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12237-021-00999-y

Keywords

British Columbia; Fjord; Subsurface oxygen minimum; Upwelling; Downwelling; Remineralization

Funding

  1. Tula Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A subsurface oxygen minimum layer was identified and characterized in Rivers Inlet, influenced by the cessation of winter storms, remineralization of organic matter, and deep-water renewal. The strength and persistence of the OML vary interannually due to hemispheric-scale winds and primary production, with hypoxic conditions in some years impacting the local marine ecosystem. Changes in downwelling, upwelling, or primary production could affect the OML in the future.
A subsurface oxygen minimum layer (OML) in intermediate water is identified and characterized in Rivers Inlet, a fjord on British Columbia's central coast, using data from 1998 to 2018. The OML was observed in most years from May to September and was most persistent at the middle and head of the fjord. The Rivers Inlet OML develops in three stages: (i) in early spring, the cessation of winter storms from downwelling-favourable winds stops the ventilation of the water column; (ii) throughout spring and summer, the remineralization of organic matter, likely primarily phytoplankton, consumes oxygen in the intermediate waters; (iii) in late spring, deep-water renewal by oxygenated offshore water forms the base of the OML inside the inlet. The strength and persistence of the OML vary interannually, mainly due to variability in hemispheric-scale winds and primary production. In some years, the OML was hypoxic, which could influence the local marine ecosystem. Changes to downwelling, upwelling, or primary production in Rivers Inlet could affect the OML in the future.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available