Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Flexible Sensitivity Analysis for Observational Studies Without Observable Implications
Alexander M. Franks et al.
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION (2020)
Use of E-values for addressing confounding in observational studies-an empirical assessment of the literature
Manuel R. Blum et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)
Commentary: Cynical epidemiology
Jay S. Kaufman
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)
Commentary: The value of E-values and why they are not enough
Matthew P. Fox et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)
Commentary: Developing best-practice guidelines for the reporting of E-values
Tyler J. VanderWeele et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)
Commentary: An argument against E-values for assessing the plausibility that an association could be explained away by residual confounding
Sander Greenland
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)
Commentary: Continuing the E-value's post-publication peer review
Charles Poole
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2020)
RE: APPLYING THE E VALUE TO ASSESS THE ROBUSTNESS OF EPIDEMIOLOGIC FIELDS OF INQUIRY TO UNMEASURED CONFOUNDING
Ghassan B. Hamra
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)
Limitations and Misinterpretations of E-Values for Sensitivity Analyses of Observational Studies
John P. A. Ioannidis et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2019)
Correcting Misinterpretations of the E-Value
Tyler J. VanderWeele et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2019)
Applying the E Value to Assess the Robustness of Epidemiologic Fields of Inquiry to Unmeasured Confounding
Ludovic Trinquart et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2019)
Technical Considerations in the Use of the E-Value
Tyler J. VanderWeele et al.
JOURNAL OF CAUSAL INFERENCE (2019)
The Harm Done to Reproducibility by the Culture of Null Hypothesis Significance Testing
Timothy L. Lash
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2017)
Sensitivity Analysis in Observational Research: Introducing the E-Value
Tyler J. VanderWeele et al.
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2017)
Sensitivity Analysis Without Assumptions
Peng Ding et al.
EPIDEMIOLOGY (2016)
Good practices for quantitative bias analysis
Timothy L. Lash et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2014)
Relaxation Penalties and Priors for Plausible Modeling of Nonidentified Bias Sources
Sander Greenland
STATISTICAL SCIENCE (2009)
Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders
Onyebuchi A. Arah et al.
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
On model expansion, model contraction, identifiability and prior information: Two illustrative scenarios involving mismeasured variables
P Gustafson
STATISTICAL SCIENCE (2005)
Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis and Bayesian analysis of smoking as an unmeasured confounder in a study of silica and lung cancer
K Steenland et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2004)
Sensitivity analysis, Monte Carlo risk analysis, and Bayesian uncertainty assessment
S Greenland
RISK ANALYSIS (2001)
Share Paper
