4.6 Article

Effects of the antimalarial lumefantrine on Lemna minor, Raphidocelis subcapitata and Chlorella vulgaris

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.etap.2021.103635

Keywords

Lumefantrine; Antioxidant enzyme activities; Oxidative stress; Aquatic plants; Aquatic toxicity

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study suggests that Lumefantrine has adverse but variable effects on the growth and physiology of the studied aquatic plants, with a decline in growth for some species and stimulation in growth for others. This indicates that the pharmaceutical may have different impacts on various aquatic organisms.
Lumefantrine is used to treat uncomplicated malaria caused by pure or mixed Plasmodium falciparum infections and as a prophylactic against recrudescence following artemether therapy. However, the pharmaceutical is released into the aquatic environment from industrial effluents, hospital discharges, and human excretion. This study assessed the effects of lumefantrine on the growth and physiological responses of the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris and Raphidocelis subcapitata (formerly known as Selenastrum capricornutum and Pseudokirchneriella subcapitata) and the aquatic macrophyte Lemna minor. The microalgae and macrophyte were exposed to 200-10000 mu g l- 1 and 16-10000 mu g l- 1 lumefantrine, respectively. Lumefantrine had a variable effect on the growth of the aquatic plants investigated. There was a decline in the growth of R. subcapitata and L. minor post-exposure to the drug. Contrarily, there was stimulation in the growth of Chlorella vulgaris. All experimental plants had a significant increase in lipid peroxidation, which was accompanied by an increase in malondialdehyde content. Peroxidase activity of L. minor increased only at low lumefantrine concentrations, while the opposite occurred at higher levels of the drug. Incubation in lumefantrine contaminated medium significantly up-regulated the activity of R. subcapitata cultures. Glutathione S-transferase of L. minor exposed to lumefantrine treatments had substantially higher activities than the controls. Our findings suggest lumefantrine could have adverse but variable effects on the growth and physiology of the studied aquatic plants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available