Evaluation of three common alkaline agents for immobilization of multi-metals in a field-contaminated acidic soil

We investigated three common alkaline agents (NaOH, CaO, and Mg(OH)(2)) for immobilization of four heavy metals (Pb, Zn, Cu, and Cd) in a field-contaminated soil and elucidated the underpinning principles. NaOH caused the highest pH spike in the soil, while CaO and Mg(OH)(2) served as a longer-lasting source of OH-. Amending the soil with CaO or Mg(OH)(2) at >= 0.1 mol as OH- (kg center dot soil)(-1) for 24 h was able to immobilize all four metals, while NaOH failed. NaOH leached up to 3 times more organic carbon than CaO and Mg(OH)(2), resulting in elevated leachability of the metals. Column elution tests showed that amendments by CaO and Mg(OH)(2) lowered the leachable Pb2+, Zn2+, Cu2+, and Cd2+ by 52-54%, 71-75%, 69-73%, and 68%, respectively, after 1440 pore volumes of elution. Sequential extraction revealed that the soil amendments converted the exchangeable fraction of the metals to the much less available forms. XRD and FTIR analyses indicated that formation of metal oxide precipitates and complexation with soil organic matter were responsible for the metals immobilization. Taken together the chemical cost, technical effectiveness, and environmental impact, CaO is the most suitable alkaline agent for remediation of soil contaminated with heavy metals.

Automated summary

The study found that for immobilization of heavy metals in contaminated soil, CaO and Mg(OH)(2) were more effective than NaOH, with CaO being the most suitable alkaline agent for soil remediation based on considerations of chemical cost, technical effectiveness, and environmental impact.